All comparisons

notodo vs Clara Labs: the AI scheduling assistant that didn't survive

Last updated February 20, 2026

The verdict

Clara Labs was a pioneer in AI scheduling. You'd CC clara@claralabs.com on an email thread, and it would handle the back-and-forth of finding a meeting time. For scheduling-only use cases, it was elegant. But Clara shut down, and the reasons are instructive: narrow focus on a single use case, high operational costs from the human-in-the-loop model, and difficulty expanding beyond scheduling. notodo takes the lessons from Clara's approach and builds something broader and more sustainable. Instead of email-based scheduling only, notodo is a full AI chief of staff: email triage, calendar management, task tracking, web research, voice notes, and daily briefings. The chat-first interface is more flexible than CC-ing an email address, and the scope justifies the subscription in a way that scheduling-only never could.

Feature comparison

FeaturenotodoClara LabsEdge
SchedulingCalendar management through chat with smart scheduling rules, travel buffers, and location preferences. Approval before creating eventsEmail-based scheduling via CC. Clara would handle the back-and-forth with meeting participants to find a time. Elegant for its specific use case
Email managementFull Gmail integration with AI triage, auto-archive, draft composition, and approval-gated sendingOnly participated in email threads for scheduling. No inbox management, no triage, no drafting
Task managementChat-based task creation with recurrence, priorities, and conversation linkingNo task management features
InterfaceChat-first web app with inline action cards, voice input, and mobile supportNo dedicated interface. Operated entirely through email CC. Simple but limiting
ResearchBuilt-in web research agent with real-time streaming resultsNo research capabilities
Daily briefingAI-generated daily standup with calendar overview, task summary, email highlights, and proactive suggestionsNo briefing features
Product statusActive and in development. Regular updates with new features and improvementsShut down. No longer available. Existing customers had to migrate to alternatives

notodo strengths

  • Active product with ongoing development and support
  • Broad scope: email, calendar, tasks, research, voice, briefings
  • Chat-first interface more flexible than email CC
  • EU data residency and GDPR compliance

Limitations

  • Requires switching to a chat interface rather than staying in email
  • Multi-party scheduling requires more manual coordination than Clara's email approach
  • Newer product without Clara's years of scheduling-specific refinement
  • Currently limited to Gmail and Google Calendar

Clara Labs strengths

  • Email CC approach required zero behavior change for users
  • Handled multi-party scheduling negotiations naturally through email threads
  • No app to install or interface to learn
  • Worked with any email client since it was just another email participant

Limitations

  • No longer available - the company shut down
  • Was limited to scheduling only with no email management or task features
  • Human-in-the-loop model was expensive to operate and scale
  • Email-only interface couldn't expand to other assistant functions

Pricing

notodo

Free tier available. Pro at €79/month with full features.

Clara Labs

Was $99/month for the professional plan when it was still operating. The high price for a single-function tool contributed to sustainability challenges.

Who should use what

Choose notodo if...

Solo founders and freelancers who need a broad AI assistant covering email, calendar, tasks, and research. Anyone who was a Clara user and needs a replacement with more capabilities.

Choose Clara Labs if...

Clara was best for executives who lived in email and needed hands-free scheduling. Since it's no longer available, former Clara users should evaluate current alternatives like notodo, Reclaim.ai, or Calendly.

Frequently asked questions

Why did Clara Labs shut down?

Clara relied on a human-in-the-loop model where AI handled most interactions but humans stepped in for edge cases. This was expensive to operate and hard to scale. Combined with narrow focus on scheduling-only (limiting revenue per customer) and increasing competition from simpler scheduling tools, the business model wasn't sustainable.

Is notodo the replacement for Clara?

notodo covers scheduling plus much more (email, tasks, research, voice, briefings), so it's a broader replacement. However, notodo's scheduling works through a chat interface rather than Clara's email CC approach. If you specifically need email-based scheduling negotiation, that specific workflow isn't replicated 1:1.

Does notodo handle multi-party scheduling like Clara did?

Not in the same way. Clara would join an email thread and negotiate times with all participants. notodo creates calendar events through chat based on your scheduling rules and preferences. For multi-party scheduling with external participants, you'd still coordinate times yourself or use the calendar event invitation flow.

Will notodo have the same sustainability issues as Clara?

notodo has a fundamentally different model. It's fully AI-powered (no expensive human-in-the-loop), covers multiple use cases (justifying the subscription), and uses flat-rate pricing with built-in rate limiting. The broader scope and lower operational costs address the core issues that made Clara unsustainable.

What happened to Clara's customer data when they shut down?

Clara provided a data export period before shutdown. This is a general risk with any SaaS tool. notodo mitigates this by connecting to your existing Gmail and Google Calendar rather than storing your primary data - your emails and events remain in Google's infrastructure.

Ready to reclaim
your calendar?

Join the waitlist. We're onboarding founders and agency owners who want to focus on what matters.